That potential future requires mechanisms of action to cause Safari users to switch. Nobody frames it precisely this way instead they'll say, if WebKit weren't mandated, Chromium would take over, or Google would dominate the web if not for the WebKit restriction. "WebKit couldn't compete if it had to." # They're excellent engineers some of the best, pound for pound, but there aren't enough of them.
This line is frankly insulting to the good people that work on WebKit.
#Apple webkit networking install#
Apple continues to self-preference through exclusive API access for Safari e.g., the ability to install PWAs to the home screen, implement media codecs, and much else.ĭefenders of Apple's monopoly offer hard-to-test claims, but many boil down to the idea that Apple's product is inferior by necessity. publishes a paltry set of options that carry an unmistakable odour of first-party app requirements. Apple will not even allow competing browsers to provide different runtime flags to WebKit. For 14 years and counting, Apple has prevented competing browsers from bringing their own engines, forcing vendors to build skins over Apple's WebKit binary, which has historically lacked feature parity, been slower, and less secure. From iOS 2.0 in '08 to iOS 14 in late '20, Apple would not allow any browser but Safari to be the default. "WebKit couldn't compete if it had to."Īpple's Long-Standing Policies Are Anti-Diversity #Ī refresher on Apple's iOS browser policies:. Apple's Long-Standing Policies Are Anti-Diversity.
0 kommentar(er)
